RiverWeb Water Quality Simulator - Creating an Educational Model


Caleb Fassett1, Olga Rostapshova2
1 Williams College
{Caleb.I.Fassett@williams.edu}
2 Swarthmore University
{olga@sccs.swarthmore.edu}
 

Abstract


The RiverWeb Water Quality Simulator is being used in high school environmental science classes to promote structured, team-based exploration of the dynamic and quantitative relationships between land use, precipitation, and a variety of water quality indicators, both chemical and biological, within an archetypal watershed. The most easily examined properties of a stream in the field include its physical properties, such as average depth, width, and velocity. After determining discharge, we calculate these physical properties using regression-based power laws on a daily basis. The actual form of the power laws varies a great deal regionally and even locally in nature, so for our archetypal watershed, we feel justified in picking a precise form for demonstration purposes. Other physical characteristics such as water temperature are currently calculated using empirical models. The accuracy of this has not been ascertained, and further research will likely be needed to determine whether we are calculating water temperature reasonably. This is a reasonably difficult problem, since in real life local conditions such as local slopes and local velocities can have important effects. As part of nationwide initiatives in the 1970s and 1980s to reduce non-point source water pollution, a great deal of study went in to determining how land-use and nutrient production was correlated (see, for example NURP). Although these studies have demonstrated the complexity of the impacts that humans have on natural watersheds, they did produce a great deal of “average” and “typical” effects of changing land use on water qualities. These “event mean concentrations” (EMC’s) for a given nutrient and land use are the source of the nutrient chemistry in our model. This data does not allow for a process-by-process assessment of nutrient chemistry, but instead represents an average of how the combination of natural processes in a normal stream affects average chemistry and allow determination of nutrient load. For each land use, different pairs of EMC values for runoff and groundwater were used, because nutrients propagate differently in groundwater and runoff. Sometimes adequate EMC data were not available for a land use or nutrient. In these cases, we made estimates based on what we considered to be the dominant processes in the natural system. This section of the model will likely be refined with further research.